Research Info

Home /Band Alignment and ...
Title Band Alignment and Charge-Transport Tradeoffs in Ag2S QD Solar Cells: Quantum Confinement vs. Recombination Across Sizes and Thicknesses
Type JournalPaper
Keywords Ag2S · SCAPS-1D · Photovoltaic · Quantum dot · Effective density of states · Quantum confinement · Generation · Recombination
Abstract This simulation-based study uses SCAPS-1D to design and optimize silver sulfide (Ag₂S) solar cells in both bulk and quantum dot (QD) absorber configurations. Ag₂S, a low-cost and environmentally benign material, was investigated with absorber sizes ranging from bulk to 10 nm, 5 nm, 3 nm, and 2 nm QDs. Parameters for QDs smaller than 10 nm are extrapolated using quantum confinement theory and have not been experimentally confirmed; these simulations represent a theoretical exploration of extreme quantum confinement. This simulation-based study uses SCAPS-1D to design and optimize silver sulfide (Ag₂S) solar cells in both bulk and quantum dot (QD) absorber configurations. For QDs smaller than 10 nm, SCAPS-1D treats the absorber as a homogeneous effective medium and cannot explicitly model ligand chemistry, interdot tunneling, or energetic disorder. Therefore, results for 5 nm, 3 nm, and 2 nm QDs should be interpreted as hypothetical sensitivity analyses exploring quantum confinement trends, not as quantitative predictions for real devices. Within this framework, bulk Ag₂S and 10 nm QDs achieved the highest simulated efficiencies (16.60% and 16.86%, respectively), while smaller QDs exhibited higher built-in potentials and Voc due to quantum confinement but suffered from intensified recombination losses. These efficiency values are simulation results obtained using SCAPS-1D with effective-medium approximations for QD solids; they represent theoretical upper limits under idealized assumptions rather than predictions for existing experimental devices. Thickness optimization further highlighted distinct trends across device types. Bulk Ag₂S reached a maximum simulated efficiency of 23.65% at ~ 500 nm, whereas QD absorbers required much thinner layers: ~150 nm for 10 nm QDs, ~ 110 nm for 5 nm QDs, and only 21–30 nm for 3 nm and 2 nm QDs. Overall, these findings demonstrate that no single QD size is universally optimal; instead, high-performance Ag₂S solar cells demand careful balancing of absorber thickness, QD size, and interface engineering. This work provides theoretical insights for advancing Ag₂S-based photovoltaics as sustainable alternatives in next-generation solar technologies.
Researchers Masood Mehrabian (First Researcher), Omid Akhavan (Not In First Six Researchers), Ghodrat Mahmoudi (Fifth Researcher), Asmet N. Azizova (Fourth Researcher), Pourya Norouzzadeh (Third Researcher), Maryam Taleb‑Abbasi (Second Researcher)